Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady

2019, Vol: 8, Issue: 4

8 / 4Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Cover Letter
Title Page

« Previous Article

Original Research

J Behav Health. 2013; 2(2): 112-119

doi: 10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady.

Cited by (9)

Abstract
Heavy drinking among college students is associated with social, health, and legal problems. One factor that may contribute to heavy drinking is an attentional bias for alcohol-related cues, which can influence drinking automatically and without an individualâ€™s awareness. Using tests of alcohol-related attentional bias, such as the alcohol Stroop task, previous research has shown that alcohol dependent drinkers have greater attentional biases than non-dependent drinkers, but results for college student drinkers have been mixed. The present study examined alcohol Stroop task performance and its relationship to drinking levels and drinking-related problems among 84 college students during the 2009-2010 academic year with at least one binge drinking episode in the previous month. As hypothesized, results indicated that participants had greater attentional interference when alcohol words were presented compared to when neutral words were presented during the Stroop task, suggesting that the students in the sample displayed greater attentional biases for alcohol words compared to neutral words. Results showed that Stroop task responding did not vary by drinking frequency or drinking-related problems, but did vary by drinking intensity. Presentation of alcohol-related cues may cause heavier drinking college students to attend to these stimuli, which may increase the saliency of these cues and influence their likelihood of drinking. Implications for prevention and treatment efforts are discussed.

Key words: alcohol Stroop test, attention, binge drinking, college students, information processing

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Kevin A Hallgren Articles by Barbara S McCrady
	on Google
	on Google Scholar
	Article Statistics
	Viewed: 6356 Downloaded: 869 Cited: 9

REFERENCES

1. Borsari B, Carey K. Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. J Subst Abuse. 2001; 13(4): 391-424. [DOI via Crossref]

2. Borsari B, Murphy JG, Barnett NP. Predictors of alcohol use during the first year of college: Implications for prevention. Addict Behav. 2007; 32: 2062-86. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC Free Fulltext]

3. Stacy AW, Wiers RW. An implicit cognition, associative memory framework for addiction. Eds.: MunafÃ² M, Albery IP. In:Cognition and Addiction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 31-72.

4. Albery IP, Sharma D, Niazi A, Moss AC. Theoretical perspectives and approaches. Eds.: MunafÃ² M, Albery IP. In:Cognition and Addiction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 1-30.

5. Field M. Attentional biases in drug abuse and addiction: Cognitive mechanisms, causes, consequences, and implications. Eds.: MunafÃ² M, Albery IP. In:Cognition and Addiction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 1-30. [Pubmed] [PMC Free Fulltext]

6. Weinstein A., Cox WM. Cognitive processing of drug-related stimuli: The role of memory and attention. J Psychopharm. 2006; 20(6): 850-9. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

7. Franken IHA. Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuro Psychopharm Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 27(4): 563-79. [DOI via Crossref]

8. McCarthy DM, Thompsen DM. Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006; 20(4): 436-44. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

9. Ostafin BD, Palfai TP. Compelled to consume: The Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006; 20(3): 322-7. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

10. Reich RR, Below MC, Goldman MS. Explicit and implicit measures of expectancy and related alcohol cognitions: A meta-analytic comparison. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010; 24(1): 13-25. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC Free Fulltext]

11. Bruce G, Jones BT A pictorial Stroop paradigm reveals an alcohol attentional bias in heavier compared to lighter social drinkers. J Psychopharm. 2004; 18(4): 527-33. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

12. Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Alcohol-attentional bias and motivational structure as independent predictors of social drinkers' alcohol consumption. Drug Alcohol Dependence. 2008; 97(3): 247-56. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

13. Johnsen BH, Laberg JC, Cox WM, Vaksdal A, Hugdahl K. Alcoholic subjects' attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words. Psychol Addict Behav. 1994: 8(2): 111-5. [DOI via Crossref]

14. Lusher J, Chandler C, Ball D. Alcohol dependence and the alcohol Stroop paradigm: Evidence and issues. Drug Alcohol Dependence. 2004; 75(3): 225-31. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

15. Sharma D, Albery IP, Cook C. Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction. 2001; 96(2): 285-95. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

16. Cox WM, Brown MA, Rowlands LJ. The effects of alcohol cue exposure on non-dependent drinkers' attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003; 38(1): 45-9. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

17. Cox WM, Yeates GN, Regan CN. Effects of alcohol cues on cognitive processing in heavy and light drinkers. Drug Alcohol Dependence. 1999; 55(1): 85-9. [DOI via Crossref]

18. Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM. The Addiction-Stroop task: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bul. 2006; 132(3): 443-76. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

19. Phaf RH, Kan K. The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. J Behav Therapy Exp Psychiatry. 2007; 38(2): 184-99. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

20. Tibboel H, De Houwer J, Field M. Reduced attentional blink for alcohol-related stimuli in heavy social drinkers. J Psychopharm. 2010; 24: 1349-56. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

21. Siegrist M. Test-retest reliability of different versions of the Stroop task. J Psychol: Interdisc Appl. 1997; 131(3): 299-306. [DOI via Crossref]

22. Birch CD, Stewart SH, Wiers RW, Klein RM, MacLean AD, Berish MJ. The mood-induced activation of implicit alcohol cognition in enhancement and coping motivated drinkers. Addict Behav. 2008; 33(4): 565-81. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

23. Carroll JB, Davies P, & Richman B. Word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1971.

24. Forster KI, Forster JC. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Methods Instruments Computers. 2003; 35(1): 116-24. [DOI via Crossref]

25. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. Eds.: Litten RZ & Allen J. In: Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press; 1992. p. 41-72. [DOI via Crossref]

26. White HR, Labouvie EW. Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 1989; 50(1): 30-7. [Pubmed]

27. Miller ET, Neal DJ, Roberts LJ, Baer JS, Cressler SO, Metrik J, et al. Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between Internet-based assessment and traditional methods? P Addict Behav. 2002; 16(1): 56-63. [DOI via Crossref]

28. Frings C, Englert J, Wentura D, Bermeitinger C. Decomposing the emotional stroop effect. Quarterly J Exp Psychol. 2010; 63(1): 42-9. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

29. McKenna FP, Sharma D. Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. J Exp Psychol Learning Memory Cognition. 2004; 30(2): 382-92. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

30. Sharma D, Money S. Carryover effects to addiction-associated stimuli in a group of marijuana and cocaine users. J Psychopharm. 2009; 24(9): 1309-16. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

31. Waters AJ, Sayette MA, Wertz J. Carry-over effects can modulate emotional Stroop effects. Cognition Emotion. 2003; 17: 501-9. [DOI via Crossref]

32. Waters AJ, Sayette MA, Franken IHA, Schwartz JE. Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Beahv Res Therapy. 2005; 43(6): 715-32. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

33. Monti PM, & Rohsenow DJ. Coping skills training and cue-exposure therapy in the treatment of alcoholism. Alcohol Res Health. 1999; 23(2): 107-15. [Pubmed]

34. Jennison KM. The short-term effects and unintended long-term consequences of binge drinking in college: A 10-year follow-up study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004; 30(3): 659-84. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed]

35. Wechsler H, Dowdall GW, Davenport A, Castillo S. Correlates of college student binge drinking. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(7): 921-6. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] [PMC Free Fulltext]

This Article Cited By the following articles

Alcoolisation ponctuellement importante et modification des biais dâ€™attention sÃ©lectiveÂ : nouvelles perspectives de prÃ©ventionÂ ? Journal de ThÃ©rapie Comportementale et Cognitive 2019; (): .	1

The dual-process model in young adults with a consistent binge drinking trajectory into adulthood Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2018; 186(): 113.	2

Differential impairments across attentional networks in binge drinking Psychopharmacology 2017; 234(7): 1059.	3

Binge drinking affects brain oscillations linked to motor inhibition and execution Journal of Psychopharmacology 2017; (): 026988111668925.	4

Acute impact of caffeinated alcoholic beverages on cognition: A systematic review Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 2017; 76(): 188.	5

Efecto del estrÃ©s social agudo sobre impulsividad, toma de riesgos y sesgos atencionales en jÃ³venes con y sin historia familiar de abuso de alcohol Suma PsicolÃ³gica 2017; 24(2): 115.	6

Efecto del estrÃ©s social agudo sobre impulsividad, toma de riesgos y sesgos atencionales en jÃ³venes con y sin historia familiar de abuso de alcohol Suma PsicolÃ³gica 2016; (): .	7

Binge Drinkers Are Fast, Able to Stop â€“ but They Fail to Adjust J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2016; 22(1): 38.	8

Human Performance Optimization Metrics Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 2015; 29(): S221.	9

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. J Behav Health. 2013; 2(2): 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Web Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. http://www.jbehavioralhealth.com/?mno=25532 [Access: January 23, 2020]. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. J Behav Health. 2013; 2(2): 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. J Behav Health. (2013), [cited January 23, 2020]; 2(2): 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Harvard Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady (2013) Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. J Behav Health, 2 (2), 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Turabian Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. 2013. Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. Journal of Behavioral Health, 2 (2), 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Chicago Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. "Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers." Journal of Behavioral Health 2 (2013), 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady. "Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers." Journal of Behavioral Health 2.2 (2013), 112-119. Print. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Kevin A Hallgren, Barbara S McCrady (2013) Interference in the alcohol Stroop task with college student binge drinkers. Journal of Behavioral Health, 2 (2), 112-119. doi:10.5455/jbh.20130224082728

Contact Information

Your comments are very important to us

How to cite this article

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access. The articles in Journal of Behavioral Health are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Copyright © 2020 Journal of Behavioral Health All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to Journal of Behavioral Health. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome	Contact Information Your comments are very important to us We welcome your ideas, suggestions, comments, or questions. To reach Editorial Board please use one of the methods provided below. Email us at info[at]scopemed.com We will respond within 48 to 72 hours. Change of address or personal information? Please visit your account at www.ejmanager.com to update your information.